WS: That's quite an interesting contrast with Baltimore which shares many similar features with Detroit (i.e. blockbusting, white flight, working class population). But my reading is that the current population of Baltimore (80% black) is not at all interested in politics, let alone radical - to the point that Schmoke (the current black mayor) can virtually ignore black concerns and pander exclusively to the interests of his cronies, gambling promoters and local robber barons (who are mostly white - but I think that the only color that matters to the mayor is green). Most bumper stickers you see in the city threaten you with assorted perils if you do not find Jesus, rather than call for a radical political action.
>
>Now all the big bourgeoisie are happy with current Mayor Archer, so
Detroit gets a good grade as a reward , and good press. We are "coming
back", according to them. Compuware is now going to locate a headquarters
downtown. GM just moved its headquarters from midcity to downtown ( the
significance being they didn't move it OUT of the city). Casinos are being
built. Land values are going up. Archer wants to abolish the city business
tax altogether.
WS: Well, but I think there must be using using some seemingly objective criteria, not just "because we say so." There is clearly some urban revitalization going on, but what makes me wonder is how urban revitalization in Detroit or Baltimore compares to that in, say, NYC, Chicago or Boston? Any stats?
Wojtek