Protests turned violent in China

Henry C.K. Liu hliu at mindspring.com
Sun May 9 21:49:33 PDT 1999


Monday May 10 1999

The Embassy Bombing

Marchers try to

break down

consulate door

MATTHEW MILLER in Guangzhou

Protests turned violent in Guangzhou last night

as demonstrators and police clashed at the

German consulate.

The trouble came after more than 1,000

protesters broke through a barricade sealing off

the Shamian diplomatic district and marched

towards the American Consulate.

They were stopped by anti-riot police, who

chased them away, and instead gathered

outside the German Consulate and tried to

break down the front doors.

Although dozens of police were present, they

initially did not try to stop the protesters.

Anti-riot police intervened half-an-hour later.

Many of the protesters appeared to be

workers, in contrast to demonstrations earlier

in the day.

Then, tens of thousands of students from

univesities in Guangzhou braved a continuous

downpour to condemn the Nato bombing.

They first gathered outside the Gitic Building,

home to the consulates of Britain, France, the

Netherlands and Italy and then marched to the

US Consulate in Shamian.

They were joined by another procession

turned away from the China Hotel, home to

the Danish and Canadian consulates. "Combat

hegemonism", "Combat Nato" and "Blood

debts are paid in blood" were among the cries

of the demonstrators.

Chen Weizhong of the Guangzhou Agriculture

School, said: "It's a crime of Nato and

imperialism.

"Hegemonism will be defeated by the people

of the world."

Police officers wearing anti-riot gear ringed the

American consulate, 100 metres west of the

White Swan Hotel. Groups of protesters

marched past the consulate in order. Some

students threw eggs at the consulate.

Guan Lihui, a man in his 60s, tried to

approach the consulate but was stopped by

police.

He said: "When I was 16, I took part in the

Korean War and killed many invaders. I want

to let them know we Chinese are heroes and

are not afraid of hegemonism."

Tong Guoqiang, from Guangzhou Petroleum

College, said: "This was a deliberate

provocation and every Chinese should stand

up and say 'no' and 'stop'. We cannot stand

this."

Social organisations, academics, official

trade unions, lawyers' associations and

political parties friendly to the

Communist Party joined the chorus to

express their indignation against the

bombing.

In one meeting of scientists held in

Beijing, Liu Guangding, of the Chinese

Academy of Sciences, said the bombing

was "well and elaborately planned".

Xinhua quoted the 70-year-old

geophysicist as saying the attack could

not be accidental. "It is impossible to

attack a target from three different angles

without careful, prior preparations," he

said.

Nato has said the pilot targeted the

building on faulty information.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list