NATO bombs Chinese embassy

[Carl Remick]

> Frankly though, I'm more comfortable thinking that the Clinton
> administration is engaging in illicit bombing than bombing 
> without maps.  At
> least it doesn't hold open the possibility that there may be 
> a war machine
> running with nobody at the driver's seat.

Talk about a distinction without a difference.  Why, exactly, is it
preferable to have someone at the controls -- who, of necessity, must be
a lunatic or a war criminal -- rather than to have "nobody in the
driver's seat"?

Carl Remick