>Kelley, sweet dream, you seem to be stranded in the left field here. This
>whole variable correlation thing is based on the notion of probablity (i.e.
>the probablity that the correlation equals zero). An that is, by
>definition, pertaining to sets not individuals.
wojtek, sweetpea, i was talking individual person's v. social groups
> Not to mention the relative
>desirablity of giving or getting a head.
no doubt.
heads i win, tails you lose, kelley
"The rest obsequate[d]"