On re-reading the memo, I think the most interesting sentence is the last. Talk about following an argument out to its logical conclusions!
> "The problem with the arguments against all of these proposals for more
> pollution in LDCs (intrinsic rights to certain goods, moral reasons, social
> concerns, lack of adequate markets, etc.) could be turned around and used
> more or less effectively against every Bank proposal for liberalization."
Michael
PS -- By the way, who is Lant Pritchett? That's not just some fancy code for "Larry Summers is a Prick" is it? :o)
__________________________________________________________________________ Michael Pollak................New York City..............mpollak at panix.com