First off, if you're going to repost my timeless prose and omit sentences that render the remaining even less intelligible, please insert elipses to reflect your 'editing.'
> >>I agree that bombing gave Milo cover to be more
> brutal than otherwise in the given time frame. **** !!! ****
In other words, with no bombing I would say Kosovo could have
gotten
> into similar straits over a more protracted period. Milo could
> have gradually escalated his criminal deeds to simlar effect,
> helped by NATO rhetorical dithering and provocations
> by the KLA. Semicolon. >
> For someone who spells Kosovo with an "a" this is an strange
position to
take. You're saying that it's good that we've made things worse
for the
Kosovars by bombing -- because, had we not bombed, things might
have
> gotten as bad as they are now anyway. >
I have no idea how you infer this from anything I've written, now or any other time.
>
> I agree with the emphasis on self-determination for Kosovo.
That is what
Milosevic accepted at Rambouillet and the U.S. blocked, because
it insisted on NATO troops to enforce the deal. >
Milosevic accepts self-determination for Kosova? Good grief.
mbs