glass steagall
Carl Remick
carlremick at hotmail.com
Fri Nov 5 11:47:48 PST 1999
>Max Sawicky wrote:
>
>> The S&L bailout was a foretaste of
>>what we could be in for after Glass-Steagall.
>
>Because the S&Ls were allowed, unsupervised, to do business in areas
>about which they knew nothing. I said it's how they're regulated that
>matters.
Yes, but that begs the question. Since there is no chance whatsoever that
oversight of financial capital will be tightened in the current political
climate, why recreate the seamless web of institutionalized chicanery that
existed in the 1920s?
Carl
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list