Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:27:21 -0500 From: "Charles Brown" <CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us>
October 19, 1999
The Future of Socialism
By Jeremy Cronin <sacp at wn.apc.org>
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels realised one and a half centuries ago that the future of socialism was intimately linked to the future of capitalism. Browse the Communist Manifesto (written in 1848) and you may be surprised to find it is, in part, a eulogy to capitalism. It praises capitalism's spirit of innovation, its restless energy that spans the world and creates the basis for global unity for the first time in human history.
There is just one problem. All of this impressive dynamism is driven, not by global solidarity, but by private profit-taking. The Marxist vision of a communist future was, then, not about the abolition of all that capitalism was building, but about socialising the possibilities manifest in the first great wave of globalisation 150 years ago. If socialism is to have a future, then it has to re-connect with this original thought.
A discussion of the future of socialism must also address itself candidly to the immediate past of socialism. In the 20th century there have been two major socialist projects. The one, in key parts of the developed North, was social democracy. The other, largely in the East and South, took inspiration from the 1917 Bolshevik revolution. These two currents split, in the course of the First World War, what had been a common international socialist movement.
The differences between them have often been noted. The one nurtured for some 25 years after World War 2 welfare states that achieved admirable levels of civilisation. The other, in the name of "communism", led vast and often authoritarian Third World modernisation programmes in the formerly feudal Eurasian expanses of a Russia and China.
Less remarked upon are the similarities in both the social democratic and communist projects of our century. Both were focused, rather exclusively, on state power as a commanding height to be captured, by election or insurrection. Both came to be associated with narrow party political projects, straying into bureaucratisation and away from the pluralistic, social movement base that had been a feature of 19th century socialism.
Both have also foundered, to some extent, on the increasing globalisation of production. The cross-class social pacts that underpinned the welfare state were, by the mid-1970s, increasingly dumped by Swedish or German capitalists. These national bourgeoisies, having retrieved competitiveness, thanks to post-war, state-led, national reconstruction programmes, now preferred to reap super-profits in the Third World, rather than paying taxes for social infrastructure at home.
On the other side, the attempt to build socialism in one country, and then in one bloc, collapsed at the beginning of the 1990s. The walls, built to keep capitalism out, became prison walls for the communist project itself.
If socialism is to have a future, it cannot be based on a mechanical repetition of its own recent past.
But what about capitalism? It has proved to be remarkably resilient through this century. But I agree with a growing body of international opinion - ranging from Fidel Castro to George Soros - that despite its seeming vitality, contemporary capitalism is in a deep-seated systemic crisis.
In brief, this crisis, which dates back to 1973, is one of several long cycle (as distinct from shorter business cycle) downturns in the world capitalist economy. As with similar periods of structural crisis - 1825-45, 1872-92, and 1929-48 - at heart, it is a crisis of over-accumulation and declining profitability.
Historically, capitalism has surpassed these crises through the mass destruction of capital (in war), through externalising costs by depleting the environment and plundering non-renewable resources, by frenetically intensifying production, and by extending production to new areas of the globe in which work forces are non-unionised and labour is cheap.
In an era of nuclear weapons, of growing and irreparable environmental degradation, and of new union movements from South Korea to Brazil, each of these options is increasingly foreclosed.
More than in previous systemic crises, we have also seen over the last 25 years the dramatic "financialisation" of the global economy - the real economy of production is now dangerously dwarfed by a casino economy, involving vast flows of speculative hot money. These flows are both a response to, and a frightening symptom of the present crisis.
We cannot go on like this. But that does not mean humanity will realise in time, with sufficient coherence and purpose, that the private and corporate profit-taking logic, that still drives our world, is also driving us all over the edge.
Capitalist crises give birth to a range of responses - many of them entirely negative, like fascism and nazism in the 1930s, or xenophobic religious fundamentalism in the present.
The future of socialism lies in joining with a wide array of progressive forces - with those concerned about the environment, or global inequality, or preserving and deepening democratic institutions, or overcoming gender oppression, or with those who, perhaps from religious conviction, are alarmed at the commercialisation of social relations and the loss of human solidarity.
While socialism requires, no doubt, dedicated political parties, it needs also to broaden, pluralise and socialise itself in a shared project of human civilisation. That is its future.
Jeremy Cronin Deputy General Secretary, South African Communist Party
-30-
[Articles on BRC-NEWS may be forwarded and posted on other mailing lists/discussion forums, as long as proper attribution is given to the author and originating publication, and the wording is not altered in any way. In particular, if there is a reference to a web site where an article was originally located, please do *not* remove that.
Unless stated otherwise, do *not* publish or post the entire text of any copyrighted articles on web sites (web-based discussion forums exempted) or in print, without getting *explicit* permission from the article author or copyright holder. Check the fair use provisions of the copyright law in your country for details on what you can and can't do.
As a courtesy, we'd appreciate it if you let folks know how to s*bscribe to BRC-NEWS, by leaving in the first two lines of the signature below.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- BRC-NEWS: Black Radical Congress - General News/Alerts/Announcements -------------------------------------------------------------------------- S*bscribe: Email "s*bscribe brc-news" to <majordomo at tao.ca> --------------------------------------------------------------------------