"Max B. Sawicky" wrote:
>
> Buchanan and Tullock are anti-state, hence
> pinning upon them the growth of an authoritarian
> state is problematic.
Max, I thought the point of the article was that antistate did not necessarily mean what it seems. Antistate types can be perfectly content to call in the state to put down unions. Antistate rhetoric usually means opposition to anything that interferes with capital.
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu