Shining victories of the party line (was: Re: defining fascism)

[Johannes Schneider]

Charles Brown wrote:
> From: "Chip Berlet" <cberlet at igc.org>
> Dimitroff's definition is a paltry rhetorical device in defense of a
failed
> parrty line.
>
>
> (((((((((((((
>
> Charles: Disagree. The Red Army inflicted 90% of the casualties on the
Nazis. The defeat of fascism is one of the shining victories of the party
line.
Charles,
just a few questions for you about the _raise_ of fascism:
- Whats about the failure of the German CP to build a united front with the
SPD by calling the 'social-fascists'?
- Whats about the Spanish CP subordination under bourgeois forces and thus
allowing the fascist success?
- Whats about the purges in the Red Army leaving the Soviet state almost
defensless in 1941?
Considering all those zig-zags of the party line, wouldnt it be more correct
to say the victory of the Red Army was achieved despite the party line?
Johannes