now that's a cynical attitude, not an ironic one, but i did note what seemed to me a correlation between this kind of cynicism and the tendency toward reflexive irony-- i.e., a tendency to highlight the ironic aspect of any situation that was not an occasional matter of literary choice, but a routinized facet of worldview.
well, that's a fairly stilted enunciation of a fairly banal point. dylan said it better--there are many here among us who think that life is but a joke...
-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Doug Henwood Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 12:52 PM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: RE: irony, etc.
Steve Perry wrote:
>well, what i have in mind at this very moment is that
>you ought to read the rest of the sentence, and the paragraph.
...which is:
>(and its longtime companion, paralytic
>cynicism) in the livelier minds round journalism and
>academe. they've essentially ceded "serious" writing to
>the dullards.
...and leaves me none the wiser. I'm at a loss to name the "livelier minds round journalism and academe" who are paralyzed by cynicism (which is very different from irony: irony is a longstanding though nonmonagamous companion of critique, while cynicism, as Horkheimer said, is the worst kind of conformity). Most academic writing is deadly earnest, and most American journalism is either just-the-facts empiricism or dumbshit cheerleading. I guess these are the dullards who've been ceded "serious" writing, but I'm still wondering who these bright & lively minds are.
Doug