On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Nathan Newman wrote:
> The fact that Clinton got 49% of the vote rather than the 56-58% he
> would probably have received cut his coattails quite a bit.
Anti-Clintonites usually wield a breakdown saying Willie got 43% of the vote. Is that oft-repeated nonsense, or am I misremembering? The idea of a minority president has much less bite if it was 49%.
Michael __________________________________________________________________________ Michael Pollak................New York City..............mpollak at panix.com