fulani-wise

[William S. Lear]

On Sunday, November 28, 1999 at 02:18:29 (-0500) Doug Henwood writes:
>Michael Pollak wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Nathan Newman wrote:
>>
>>  > The fact that Clinton got 49% of the vote rather than the 56-58% he
>>  > would probably have received cut his coattails quite a bit.
>>
>>Anti-Clintonites usually wield a breakdown saying Willie got 43% of the
>>vote.  Is that oft-repeated nonsense, or am I misremembering?  The idea of
>>a minority president has much less bite if it was 49%.
>
>Clinton got 43% in '92, 49% in '96.

Is this a percentage of registered voters?  Wasn't Ronald Reagan's
percentage very low also?

What are the figures when you look at eligible voters?  20% maybe?

Bill