>>> kelley <kcwalker at syr.edu> 10/04/99 06:46PM >>>
chazmatazz baby! wonders.......
>
>Charles: Whatever happened to the Judith Butler reading ? Are the answers
there , ferfucksake ?
>
>CB
HAH! i wondered if any o' you buoyz recalled a late night comment to the effect that mebbe butler [et al.] could help us understand how discourse is productive insofar as it defines how we understand our bodies/physical responses -- i.e., that westerners seem to think that height of sexual pleasure=ejaculation. [as in the long time search for a corollary event in females, etc etc.]
(((((((((((((((
Charles: I did a quick survey of some women. They have pleasure. The search for the "corrollary event" is a wild goose chase. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
((((((((((((((((((((
btw, chaz, i wonder what ted byfield would think of your claim that [re] dick size has something to do with diet. hah! you said this once, around the same time we were trying to get a butler reading off the ground. what say you now? ((((((((((((
Charles: You seem to think this is not likely. Take an extreme example: a child who has kwashikur (spelling) Every organ of the body may fail to reach full growth potential. Kinda like, a, b, c. ( See elementary physiology textbook).
((((((((((((((((((
oh well, chaz, the snit's back for a bit. i see you've missed me!
<sniff> you love me. you really love me! <blubber>
snitgrrRl fields aka barbie, barbarella, kY, killer, miss kelley, k
PS., actually, i won't be around all that much coz the Snit, along with Ken and Kirsten, have started a new list. and one o' the reasons that i've been buried in lurk mode, among other things is that the ol' snitgrrRl has been larnin' me how to build a web page and make kewloneato graphics. if the snit does a reading of butler anywhere it will be on the new list most likely.
(((((((((((((
Charles: Uh huh
CB