Of gods and vampires: an introduction to psychoanalysis

Charles Brown CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us
Tue Oct 5 14:04:17 PDT 1999


Why not Engels ?

The great question of all philosophy , especially modern philosophy , is idealism vs materialism.

CB


>>> <kenneth.mackendrick at utoronto.ca> 10/05/99 04:53PM >>>
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999 11:06:22 -0400 Yoshie Furuhashi <furuhashi.1 at osu.edu> wrote:


> Habermas(yuck!)? Why not Kenneth Burke?

Burke(yuck!)? Why not David Hume.

David Hume wrote in "A Treatise of Human Nature"

***** Philosophy cannot go beyond experience; and any hypothesis, that pretends to discover the ultimate original qualities of human nature, ought at first to be rejected as presumptuous and chimerical.... [and] is very sceptical, and tends to give us a notion of the imperfections and narrow limits of the human understanding.


> What we need here is a study of rhetoric, that's all.

What we need here is a study of the different ways in which we conceive an object, that's all.

ken



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list