kenneth.mackendrick at utoronto.ca wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 1999 18:40:07 -0500 Carrol Cox
> <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
>
> > kenneth.mackendrick at utoronto.ca wrote:
> >
> > > What we need here is a study of the different ways in which
> > > we conceive an object, that's all.
> >
> > Why? What good would it do? Another reprise of "Thirteen Ways of
> > Looking at a Blackbird"?
> >
> > Carrol
>
> Are you serious?
>
> You see a letter on a desk.
>
> I see a letter on a desk with Doug's name on it.
>
> Do you open it?
>
> it only gets more complicated,
> ken
Are *you* serious? Where's all this complication you promised? I really
have a hard time believing you think you've said something. "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" has much better metric. Come up with something quick. This is the first time since August I've read you and you're still disappointing.
Carrol