literature as capital

kelley oudies at flash.net
Thu Sep 2 08:51:41 PDT 1999


speaking of supposedly obscurantist theory..............

doug forwarded this from CEPR:

". "Literature" in the paper refers to earlier

production of imaginative works which represents capital or is

still read."

is this to suggest that there is some sort of utilitarian distinction being made here? some of the stuff that we read is capital and the rest is just around by virtue of being "still read"? wow.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list