*... and Chang (but, before i start speaking, i'd like to say something - if forms had meanings...
>Hello ,
>A friend
>to explain how
>My answer below:
>I am not an economist.
>anti-Marxist, because Marxists
>I am anti-bourgeois, be
>evil. They use only
>make the gov
>ernment
> pay no
*... and if names were verbs...
to chang - or not to chang: that never jims the answer - just lboes a question maxed in silence (even if ackermanned gently
in pollacked reality). You may barkley or brad... So, why hoover the difference for kelley to zizek, or ken to kelley, coxing cyber to chris in L.? but being yoshied or angelaed doesn't wojtek convincingly - tho' it rakeshes, jeffreys and browns on - till it dougs to a nathanised changstill... I don't remick to stephen or kilander part in a robbed revolution if i can't elena chang-ly now...
*...there might be more successful revolutions.