>Some new stuff from the Financial Markets Center
>on regulation of margin requirements for stock
>purchases (http://www.fmcenter.org). Probably
>give a few of you guys orgasms.
>
>I follow their stuff so I'd be interested in
>reactions, though you can keep any secretions
>to yourself.
>
>mbs
hmmm ... not quite as "exciting" as the good old Tobin Tax, but same sort of vein. My feeling is that these guys don't get it -- sure, allowing retail to double gear up to invest in equities is insane, but changing margin regs won't stop that. People will just borrow $400,000 from Doug's consumer tip of the week and "invest" it.
the analysis at the FMC looks good though -- just one thing caught my eye:
"Nonetheless, says a 1997 staff paper by Fed economist Paul Kupiec, "the majority in the finance profession appear to have abandoned the beliefs that underlie the original margin authority mandate." "
I have a bit of previous with Kupiec -- he was responsible for an utterly *mad* paper on something called "The Pre-Commitment Approach" in 1995/6. His suggestion (taken seriously by the Fed) was that, instead of having capital regulations, we should make banks promise not to lose money, and then fine them if they did. The mathematics worked perfectly, as long as you were prepared to believe some blindingly untrue things about management. My assessment of Kupiec is that he is a classic example of the kind of guy that gets the rest of us a reputation for being other-worldly wankers.
dd
___
___________________________________________________________________________ _____
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential to the ordinary user of the
e-mail address to which it was addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender
IMMEDIATELY on (44) 171 638 5858 and delete the message
from all locations in your computer. You should not copy
this email or use it for any purpose, or disclose its
contents to any person : to do so may be unlawful.
Email is an informal method of communication and is
subject to possible data corruption, either accidentally
or on purpose. Flemings is unable to exercise control
over the content of information contained in
transmissions made via the Internet. For these reasons
it will normally be inappropriate to rely on information
contained on email without obtaining written confirmation
of it.
----------------------------------------------------------