Steve
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Nathan Newman wrote:
>
> With some of the debates recently on the progressive vs. reactionary nature
> of the Dalai Lama, this forwarded post seems interesting.--Nathan Newman
>
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:owner-jhurd_dsa-doc at indiana.edu] On Behalf Of ANDERSON DAVID
>
> "Of all the modern economic theories, the economic system of Marxism is
> founded on moral principles, while capitalism is concerned with only with
> gain and profitability. Marxism is concerned with the distribution of
> wealth
> on an equal basis and the equitable utilization of the means of production.
> It is also concerned with the fate of the working classes--that is the
> majority--as well as the with the fate of those who are underprivileged and
> in need, and Marxism cares about the victims of minority-imposed
> exploitation. For those reasons the system appeals to me, and it seems fair.
> I just recently read an article a paper where his holiness the Pope also
> pointed out some positive aspects of Marxism...
> The failure of the regime in the Soviet Union was, for me not the failure
> of Marxism but the failure of totalitarianism. For this reason I think of
> myself as half-Marxist, half-Buddhist."
>
> The Dalai Lama in Beyond Dogma: Dialogues and Discourses
>
>
>