Marx on free trade

Jim heartfield jim at heartfield.demon.co.uk
Tue Sep 28 19:08:45 PDT 1999


In message <199909282231.SAA07394 at fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>, Michael Hoover <hoov at freenet.tlh.fl.us> writes


>I recollect Draper suggesting that class 'in itself'/'for itself'
>formulation is Hegelian residue in Marx,

Yes, and he could have added Kantian, too - but then that would be no bad thing (contra Yoshie?). Thanks for the reference. -- Jim heartfield



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list