<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Ack, Doug, my apologies about the Brazil comments.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>---------------------------------------------------------</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>From the Guardian/Observer</DIV>
<DIV><BR> </DIV>
<DIV>Clinton's foes have only one thing on their minds<BR><BR>By Barbara
Ehrenreich<BR>Wednesday January 27, 1999<BR><BR>Two or three weeks ago the only
question was 'How will Clinton get out of this?' But<BR>then the great Houdini
delivered his State of the Union address, in which he cleverly<BR>outflanked the
Republicans on the right by proposing a first step toward the<BR>privatisation -
ie, elimination - of social security, along with vast new largesse for<BR>the
Pentagon.<BR> <BR>Hillary beamed, the pundits swooned, and the question became:
'How will the<BR>Republicans ever get out of this, and why don't they do so
now?'<BR><BR>For surely the impeachment process has not been the great American
agon we<BR>were promised - Custer's Last Stand, Iwo Jima, the Battle at the OK
Corral. The<BR>visuals have been tragically dull, enlivened only by the chief
justice's scowling face<BR>and whimsically gold-striped robe. CNN, with its
gavel-to-gavel coverage of the<BR>tedium, became a video dead zone.<BR><BR>To
make a wise and timely statement about the proceedings at any time in
the<BR>last few months, all one had to do was mix and match the words
'William<BR>Jefferson Clinton', 'the Constitution of the Yew-nited States',
'impeachable offence',<BR>the 'American people' and 'fair and bipartisan' (or,
depending on one's party<BR>affiliation, 'partisan and grossly
unfair').<BR><BR>But there is one thing that holds the Republicans to their
thankless task: witnesses.<BR><BR>They want witnesses, preferably eyewitnesses,
and they keep vowing to<BR>persist till they get them. This deep,
self-destructive yearning is not to be<BR>confused, however, with the gospel
shout, 'Give me a witness!' Because the witness<BR>the Republicans most
desperately crave is the luscious, creamy-skinned Monica<BR>Lewinsky.<BR><BR>It
was essential, according to Representative Bill McCollum, that they<BR>'examine
Monica Lewinsky'. Later the language took an even more revealing turn,<BR>when
Ken Starr insisted the Republicans had the right to 'debrief' her.<BR><BR>The
Democrats quickly picked up on their antagonists' prurient intentions,
countering<BR>that a Monica appearance in the Senate would be a 'burlesque'. For
weeks, like members of an aboriginal all-male totemic cult warding off wifely
intrusions, they<BR>raged against the threatened pollution of the hallowed
chambers with smut and God-knows-what noxious female secretions.<BR><BR>When
those warnings failed to resonate, they painted a grim S&M picture of what
a<BR>Republican interview of Monica would be like: the poor child, facing a
roomful of men who have the power to throw her in prison, would be subject to
unimaginable probings and manipulations.<BR><BR>Briefly, last weekend, the
sexual drama reached a mini-climax with Ms Lewinsky's arrival in Washington. The
press corps assaulted her from all sides, struggling for a shot of her face, and
frustrated to find it hidden by a baseball cap.<BR><BR>The next day three
Republican congressmen spent two hours alone with Monica in a $5,000 a day hotel
suite - a different suite to the one she had slept in, the New York Times
assured us, lest we envision the foursome together on rumpled sheets. Emerging
from the interview, the congressmen were flushed and exuberant, reporting that
she was 'poised', 'intelligent' and 'helpful'.<BR><BR>If no hanky-panky was
discussed or proposed, what are we to make of Monica's reported post-interview
comment: 'I gave them nothing'? Note the verb: not 'told', but
'gave'.<BR><BR>What were we expecting her to give them - a sexually transmitted
disease perhaps? So don't let anyone tell you this is not about sex. The
impeachment process only makes sense when you understand that the Republicans
are the pimply high school nerds who can't get a date, while Clinton is the
football captain for whom girls eagerly 'put out'.<BR><BR>Since the Republicans
can't get Clinton, they're determined to get his discarded girlfriend, even if
their frantic efforts end up costing them their seats. </DIV></BODY></HTML>