<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
The excerpt below is from John Pilger's assessment of contemporary journalistic
practice which appears in the current edition of The New Statesman.
The full text, which begins with refutations of two Blairite attacks on
Pilger's integrity is here: <A HREF="http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/199907120012.htm">Propaganda
Dressed as Journalism</A>
<P>
<<It is this dissembling and hypocrisy, wedded to a born-again, deeply
<BR>
reactionary world-view, that inspires the "new moral cause" announced by
<BR>
Blair. The spun truth of its application in the Balkans is now unravelling
<BR>
for all to see, as it usually does when the media pack departs. Few now
<BR>
doubt that the Rambouillet talks were a set-up, used to "deliberately set
<BR>
the bar higher than the Serbs could accept", a US State Department official
<BR>
has now admitted. The terms that the Serbs accepted in June were virtually
<BR>
the same as those they themselves offered before the bombings began.
<P>
<<The whole bloody travesty was almost certainly avoidable. Thousands
of
<BR>
men, women and children, including those Kosovars Nato was claiming
<BR>
to "save", would now be alive were it not for the post-cold-war
<BR>
machinations of American power, egged on by Blair, Robertson and Cook
<BR>
with their few ageing Harrier aircraft and squadrons of propagandists.
Ian
<BR>
Black, the Guardian's man at the Foreign Office, who reported the
<BR>
Rambouillet talks, admitted that he never read the Rambouillet document
<BR>
in full.
<P>
<<Now that reverse ethnic cleansing is under way in Kosovo, under
Nato
<BR>
auspices, the drums are silent. No one is putting out more flags as
<BR>
thousands of Shea's "missing" Albanians have been "found" in their
<BR>
homes. Terrible events occurred, but nothing is what it seemed, as we
<BR>
shall continue to find out. Those who indulged Shea's deceptions, Blair's
<BR>
scripted histrionics and Clare Short's on-cue buffoonery misled the public:
<BR>
the antithesis of their remit. In a memorable piece in the Independent
last
<BR>
week, Robert Fisk described vividly the flocks of sheep who reported Shea
<BR>
without a "baa". For Fisk, it was an especially angry piece, and rightly
so.
<BR>
Like him, I have reported numerous wars and upheavals for more than 30
<BR>
years, and I have known nothing to compare with the sheer intensity of
<BR>
this propaganda dressed as journalism.
<P>
<<Fisk has since been subjected to an insidious McCarthyism we have
grown
<BR>
used to, that of personalised abuse and smear, with one sheep last Sunday
<BR>
plying schoolboy gossip suggesting that our greatest war correspondent
<BR>
was a Serb apologist. Fisk need not worry. Truth may be the first casualty;
<BR>
it is seldom the last.>>
<P> </HTML>