[mcq at pobox.com: [adh] CNN & US Army]

JC Helary helary at eskimo.com
Sun Apr 2 19:29:23 PDT 2000


I am not sure this was discussed here, but then there are so many interesting threads here that it's easy to get lost :-)

JC Helary

----- Forwarded message from Matthieu Crocq <mcq at pobox.com> -----


> FAIR-L
> Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
> Media analysis, critiques and news reports
>
>
>
>
> ACTION ALERT: WHY WERE GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA EXPERTS
> WORKING ON NEWS AT CNN?
>
> March 27, 2000
>
> Reports in the Dutch newspaper Trouw (2/21/00,
> 2/25/00) and France's
> Intelligence Newsletter (2/17/00) have revealed that
> several officers from
> the US Army's 4th Psychological Operations (PSYOPS)
> Group at Ft. Bragg
> worked in the news division at CNN's Atlanta
> headquarters last year,
> starting in the final days of the Kosovo War.
>
> In the U.S. media, so far only Alexander Cockburn,
> columnist for The Nation
> and co-editor of the newsletter CounterPunch, has
> picked up on the story.
> Cockburn's column on the subject is available at
> http://www.counterpunch.org
>
> The story is disturbing. In the 1980s, officers from
> the 4th Army PSYOPS
> group staffed the National Security Council's Office
> of Public Diplomacy
> (OPD), a shadowy government propaganda agency that
> planted stories in the
> U.S. media supporting the Reagan Administration's
> Central America policies.
>
> A senior US official described OPD as a "vast
> psychological warfare
> operation of the kind the military conducts to
> influence a population in
> enemy territory." (Miami Herald, 7/19/87) An
> investigation by the
> congressional General Accounting Office found that
> OPD had engaged in
> "prohibited, covert propaganda activities," and the
> office was soon shut
> down as a result of the Iran-Contra investigations.
> But the 4th PSYOPS group
> still operates.
>
> CNN has always maintained a close relationship with
> the Pentagon. Getting
> access to top military officials is a necessity for
> a network that stakes
> its reputation on being first on the ground during
> wars and other military
> operations.
>
> What makes the CNN story especially troubling is the
> fact that the network
> allowed the Army's covert propagandists to work in
> its headquarters, where
> they learned the ins and outs of CNN's operations.
> Even if the PSYOPS
> officers working in the newsroom did not influence
> news reporting, did the
> network allow the military to conduct an
> intelligence-gathering mission
> against CNN itself?
>
> For instance, one PSYOPS officer worked in CNN's
> satellite division.
> According to Intelligence Newsletter, rear admiral
> Thomas Steffens, a
> psychological warfare expert in the Special
> Operations Command, recently
> told a PSYOPS conference that the military needed to
> find ways to "gain
> control" over commercial news satellites to help
> bring down an
> "informational cone of silence" over regions where
> special operations were
> taking place.
>
> An unofficial strategy paper published by the U.S.
> Naval War College in 1996
> and written by an Army officer ("Military Operations
> in the CNN World: Using
> the Media as a Force Multiplier") urged military
> commanders to find ways to
> "leverage the vast resources of the fourth estate"
> for the purposes of
> "communicating the [mission's] objective and
> endstate, boosting friendly
> morale, executing more effective psychological
> operations, playing a major
> role in deception of the enemy, and enhancing
> intelligence collection."
>
>
> ACTION: Please write to CNN and ask why the network
> allowed government
> propaganda specialists to work in their news
> division.
>
> As always, please remember that letters are taken
> more seriously if they
> maintain a professional tone. Please cc-copies of
> your correspondence to
> fair at fair.org.
>
> CONTACT:
> Eason Jordan
> President, CNN International Networks and
> Newsgathering
> mailto:cnn.feedback at cnn.com
> Fax: 404-827-3134
>
> ----------
>
>
> Feel free to respond to FAIR ( fair at fair.org ). We
> can't reply to
> everything, but we will look at each message. We
> especially appreciate
> documented example of media bias or censorship. All
> messages to the
> 'FAIR-L' list will be forwarded to the editor of the
> list.
>
> Also, please send copies of email correspondence,
> including any
> responses, to us at: fair at fair.org .
>
> Feel free to spread this message around. Put it on
> conferences
> where it is appropriate. We depend on word of mouth
> to get our message
> out, so please let others know about FAIR and this
> mailing list.
>
> Don't miss a single e-mail from FAIR-L.
>
> You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site:
> http://www.fair.org/emaillist.html
> Or, you can send a "subscribe FAIR-L enter your full
> name"
> command to LISTSERV at AMERICAN.EDU.
>
> The subscriber list is kept confidential, so no need
> to worry about
> spammers.
>
>
> You may leave the list at any time by sending a
> "SIGNOFF FAIR-L"
> command to LISTSERV at AMERICAN.EDU.
>
> Please support FAIR by becoming a member.
> You will receive FAIR's magazine, EXTRA! and its
> newsletter, EXTRA!
> Update. You can become a member by calling
> 1-800-847-3993 from 9 to
> 5 Eastern Time (be sure to tell them you got the
> information
> on-line) or by sending $19 with your name and
> address to:
>
> FAIR/EXTRA! Subscription Service
> P.O. Box 170
> Congers, NY 10920-9930
>
>
> FAIR
> (212) 633-6700
> http://www.fair.org/
> E-mail: fair at fair.org
>
> list administrators: FAIR-L-request at american.edu
>
>
>
>

-- iris-adh

----- End forwarded message -----



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list