Something fishy is going on.
Enrique Diaz-Alvarez wrote:
> Doug Noland makes a good argument that money market funds have become
> money creators not subject to reserve requirements. The crux of the
> argument is that people regard money market investments as both
> stores of value and media of exchange, just like checking accounts.
> Deposits on money markets can then be re-lent without keeping reserves,
> and as long as borrowers deposit them on other money market accounts,
> the multiplier is, in principle, infinite.
> A counter argument by Paul Kasriel
> If Noland is right, and his argument does sound more persuasive, the Fed
> has effectively lost control over the US financial system. The
> Bubblemeister could not keep consumers from going into hock to buy SUVs
> and internet stocks even if he wanted to. This may explain his bizarre
> refusal to comment on debt levels. Comments?
> 1stUp.com - Free the Web®
> Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com