> >>>>The charge was that terms involving mentality have
>no scientific meaning. I'm not diluting meaning from
>terms like "ego" in my
>use of them.
>
>This isn't even falsifiable and thus is vacuous.
>
>Ian<<
>
>Annoyingly, so is this :)
Is there any good critique of the falsifiability fetish? I suspect it's questionable, but I can't put my finger on why.
Doug