>>Justin's approach takes as its starting point the mutual alienation of
>>man from man. The question for him is why does he believe what
>>scientists say, not what is the source of the knowledge. Why we believe
>>scientists is a secondary question of psychology. What is the source of
>>scientific knowledge is what is at issue. The source of scientific
>>knowledge is its object, nature.
woah! even hempel doesn't go as far as you. he made his concession speech to the crits of the pragmatists, interpretivists, etc quite some time ago.
kelley