Gore Gives up

Nathan Newman nathan at newman.org
Wed Dec 13 08:59:43 PST 2000


He's giving up because there is no daylight for challenge in the Jim Crow Five's decision; it was incredibly carefully crafted to leave no room for further challenge, in Florida or in any other state. It went out of its way to find an equal protection violation in what the Florida Supreme Court did, while specifically sanctioning unequal voting systems developed independently by separate counties and a host of other "complexities" that they would not review. This tailored smart-bomb approach to equal protection was condemned by the dissenters, but Rehnqust et al were taking no chances and no prisoners.

A complete partisan hack job from end to end. The message was, whatever you do Gore, you will lose.

The question is what Gore says- he won't declare war on Bush but the camp has put out that they won't concede that Gore lost the count. So it will probably have the character of bowing to the reality of the SC's decision and recognizing the Bush Presidency on that basis. We will see how wimpy it will be in the end. But at some point, it barely matters-- Gore is history and the issue is the disenfranchisement of his voters, not his personal decision on concession.

-- Nathan

----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Perry" <sperry at usinternet.com> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:02 AM Subject: RE: Gore Gives up

all he said was that he's suspending recount efforts. maybe he's going to challenge g-dub to a duel.

-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of SergioL652 at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 9:54 AM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Gore Gives up

C'mom people no reactions?



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list