Gore Gives up

[Justin Schwartz]

You mistke my answer, I am not saying that they should be deprived of 
jurisdiction, or that they exercised jurisdiction that they didn't have. I 
am saying that they came to an outrageously wrong answer from a legal point 
of view. --jks


>
>Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
>>The law of the case was obvious. There was no substantial federal 
>>question.
>
>Well, to paraphrase the old saying, the Supreme Court counts the
>election returns! But was this just a matter of law? Clearly some
>body had to make some kind of final decision, politically speaking,
>and given the prestige and power of the SC, why not them? After all,
>they're the ones who decide whether abortion is legal, whether
>segregation is acceptable, whether cops can stop us in the street and
>search us. So why not this?
>
>Doug

_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com