A Fresh Start At Looking At Labor And The Labor Process -- II

Leo Casey leoecasey at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 18 09:49:38 PST 2000


This is not simply a question of a theoretical shortcoming; it is reflected -- and remains a live issue today -- in the political work of workerist socialists, mostly Trot, who work within the trade union movement. As good an example as any would be the group around _Labor Notes_, because of their significant if flawed work with the TDU and because of their links with Solidarity, and its Draperite-left Shachtmanite worldview. Every proposal to transform the labor process, to democratize the workplace, is rejected by them, carte blanche, as a capitalist ploy to get greater "productivity" out of workers, to "rationalize" capitalist production, to produce a better "quality" product for the benefit of the capitalist, not the worker -- in short, to [class] collaborate with management. This is a particularly destructive approach when it is applied, as they do, to the services industries where the product which is being produced is education or health care, and where the lack of a "quality" education and health care in inner city and poor communities is an issue which should be on the forefront of the agenda of the left. Thus, they decry efforts to give teachers real democratic voice in the schools in which they teach, as part of an effort -- among other things -- to provide quality education for inner city kids, insisting that this is the work of management.

Now, precisely because it is a terrain of struggle, reorganization of work and the labor process does not necessarily lead to more worker control of the labor process, more worker control of knowledge. But the one way to guarantee that efforts in this area will result in negative setbacks for workers is to stand to the side, to engage in wholesale, mindless opposition to every effort. Allow teachers to develop an educational mission and vision for their school, and run it democratically? Give those teachers the option to run a personnel committee which hires new staff and passes on transfers into the school, rather than having folks with no idea of or commitment to the school be hired and transfer in on the basis of seniority? Hell no, the response, goes: that is management's job, and seniority must never be compromised. Set up systems of apprenticeship and peer review so that teachers take responsibility for the development and quality of their craft? Hell no, the response, goes: that is management's job, and teachers should never evaluate other teachers. And so on. In this way, control over labor process and over knowledge is ceded to management, all in the name of militant industrial unionism and Marxism.  

Leo Casey United Federation of Teachers 260 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10010-7272 (212-598-6869)

Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has, and it never will. If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters.

-- Frederick Douglass --
>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list