Rorty's Pragmatic Pilgramage

kelley kwalker2 at gte.net
Fri Dec 15 09:37:24 PST 2000


http://www.linguafranca.com/print/0012/feature_quest.html

The Quest for Uncertainty

Richard Rorty's pragmatic pilgrimage

by James Ryerson

THE TRANQUIL, HIBISCUS-LINED eucalyptus grove in the

UC-Santa Cruz arboretum is a nice spot for reflecting on philosophy's

age-old questions. Fortunately for Richard Rorty, a nature lover with a

distaste for those sorts of questions, it's also an excellent place for

bird-watching. We have driven here on a bright California morning to

do a bit of both. As we pass his binoculars back and forth, searching

the grevilleas for hummingbirds, it's hard to believe that this shy,

gentle-mannered sixty-nine-year-old Stanford professor is the same

man whose ideas have been widely denounced for the past twenty

years as cynical, nihilistic, and deeply irresponsible.

"I have even lost a friend in all of this," says Rorty of his fractious

career as America's most famous living philosopher. "It was Carl

Hempel, one of the best-loved figures in the profession and a model of

moral character." Hempel, a teacher of Rorty's, had fled Hitler's

Germany and symbolized all that was most inspiring about the

scientific, social democratic, truth-seeking world of Anglo-American

philosophy. "Hempel read my book Philosophy and the Mirror of

Nature and wrote me a letter saying, in effect, 'You have betrayed

everything I stood for.' And he really didn't like me after that. I'm still

very sad about it."

Rorty points to a bird flying overhead. "That's a kestrel," he adds

without a pause, in his doleful, sighing voice, "the smallest American

falcon."

The charge of betrayal is one Rorty has learned to accept over the

years. Like his idol John Dewey, whom he credits with breaking

through "the crust of philosophical convention," he has pursued twin

careers as disciplinary bad boy and high-minded public philosopher.

He has set out to deflate the aspirations of his profession—he rejects

the idea of truth as an accurate reflection of the world—while placing

his own unorthodox philosophical views at the center of an ambitious

vision of social and historical hope. In recent writings especially, he

champions an unlikely brand of "postmodern bourgeois liberalism" that

has largely infuriated postmodernists and liberals alike.

A lucid writer with a penchant for dropping the names of virtually all the

major thinkers in the philosophical tradition, Rorty has a knack for

making his radical rejection of truth and objectivity seem an easy and

agreeable shift of one's current perspective. Harold Bloom is not alone

in judging him "the most interesting philosopher in the world today." But

the success of philosophy's preeminent anti-philosopher has not come

easily. Seemingly everyone who is impressed with one facet of Rorty's

work harbors severe reservations about another. Those who share his

admiration for analytic philosophers like Donald Davidson, Wilfrid

Sellars, and W.V.O. Quine are angered by his opinion that analytic

philosophy does not exist "except in some such stylistic or sociological

way." Political theorists are dismayed by his proposal that their work be

replaced by "genres such as ethnography, the journalist's report, the

comic book, the docudrama, and, especially, the novel." Fellow

enthusiasts of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jacques Derrida, and Martin

Heidegger aren't comfortable seeing their favorite Continental thinkers

discussed in the frank, Anglo-American idiom in which Rorty was

trained. And radical postmodernist fans of his assault on the idea of

objective truth are disappointed to hear that his politics are "pretty

much those of Hubert Humphrey."

<...>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list