> Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> >kenneth.mackendrick at utoronto.ca wrote:
> > >
> > > Exactly which part of this is the criminal problem?
> >
> >All of it. There is no way to carry on a civil conversation with
> >anyone who believes this nonsense.
>
> And do you hold yourself up as a model of civil conversation?
No, I'm often rather uncivil, and often regret it afterwards.
-- But this garbage by Ken is in principle unfit for civil conversation.
Statements of this sort about mental illness, and in particular about those illnesses miscalled "psychoses," cannot form the substance of any conversation among decent people. Your question refers to style, my post referred to substance. There is no possible style which could make Ken's propositions civil.
He has become the third in a select list whose posts I *never* read before deleting.
Carrol