Death Penalty, the Labor Party, & Political Responsibility (wasRe: Breaking Butterflies & Poisoning Wells)

Michael Yates mikey+ at pitt.edu
Tue Feb 8 14:48:35 PST 2000


I have been arguing for some time to any who will listen that organized labor must take the issue of prisons, the death penalty etc. seriously, if only to fight against racism. Maybe I'll mention this to Linda Chavez-Thompson when I meet her tomorrow. She is speaking to U of Pittsburgh studnets and I am picking her up and intorducing her.

Michael Yates

Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> Doug wrote to Michael Yates:
>
> >I thought I'd made it clear what I thought. But maybe I didn't. I
> >wouldn't have written the article Marc did, nor would I have
> >published it in NY Press. I'm not comfortable bashing the left for
> >the amusement of cynical rightwingers. But I think Marc makes lots of
> >good points - about the odd cultishness of the Free Mumia movement,
> >about its excessive claims of innocence, and about its inability to
> >broaden into a comprehensive anti-DP movement. All Marc's critics
> >seem to have forgotten that he made very strong anti-death penalty
> >statements - unlike C Clark Kissinger, who's inspired by memories of
> >revolutionary firing squads performing public executions.
>
> If the failure to organize a comprehensive anti-Death Penalty movement is
> the main criticism of the Free Mumia movement, why not use the Labor Party
> as a vehicle for it, instead of kvetching from the sideline? I think it
> would take a mass working-class political party or movement -- something
> far bigger than the Free Mumia movement can ever hope to be -- to reverse
> Americans' sentiments toward capital punishment, cops, & prisons. Then,
> you'd have to battle not a Clark Kissinger & a Ramsey Clark, but a Max, a
> Wojtek, top labor officials, many crypt-Dems, etc., first to make the Labor
> Party get off its ass, and then to make it take up an anti-death-penalty
> campaign. Doug & Nathan have a point, but you guys don't see the beam in
> your own political eyes (of the Labor Party, the Dems, the AFL-CIO, etc.).
> Doug can use his newsletter, radio show, etc. to promote the cause, too,
> unlike Mike, Carrol, etc. Where's political responsibility? I mean,
> political responsibility of organic intellectuals? Don't mourn, organize!
>
> Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list