antisocialism

Dace edace at flinthills.com
Thu Feb 10 13:19:28 PST 2000



>I don't see any wall of insanity here; I
>see an economic and political system that systematically provides
>resources to a small elite at the expense of the majority. I think
>it sucks, sure. But to call the people who support the status quo
>out of their fucking minds is exactly the kind of individualistic
>thinking that perpetuates the status quo. If you haven't already
>guessed, I'm with Foucault on this: the psy-sciences are one of the
>pillars of modern power relations, they are not the means to our
>salvation. The further we get from using this psycho-discourse,
>the better off we'll be.
>
>Miles
>
>
It's not individualistic insofar as most of these people are as sane as anyone else in their personal day-to-day lives. But they reveal narcissistic and antisocial pathologies in the context of the group-mind. This is illustrated time and again. NGO rep Beth Burrows ran across this conundrum at the Biodiversity Convention last year in Cartagena, Colombia. The US did everything in its power to destroy the convention, which would cut into US corporate profits. Afterwards, Burrows was incensed and asked an FDA man how he could stand himself. She said right to his face, "You're an evil man." Another NGO rep who was standing nearby said, "Beth, this is not an evil man. I know him. He's a very nice person. Really." And I'm sure he is a nice man. But he unconsciously disengages his human empathy when goes to work and, being a nice man, must delude himself into thinking he's doing the right thing.

There's a great article in this week's Nation, "Letter from Zambia," that illustrates what I'm trying to get at. It talks all about the stupendous suffering going on in that all-too-typical country, about how people with treatable illnesses can't afford medical care, so they stay at home and only make it to the hospital when it's time to get carted off to the casualty ward. The Zambians even have a name for it: BID-- "Brought in Dead." As Mark Lynas writes, "For more than twenty years now the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have been forcing structural adjustment programs, or SAPs, on the bankrupt countries of Africa. **Trapped between a near-religious belief in economic neoliberalism and the US-driven interests of big business**, these two institutions are blind to the havoc they are causing."

We're dealing with a two-fold problem, part material and part mental. A lot of very smart people genuinely believe, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that neoliberalism is actually good for the majority of the world's population. They think you're crazy if you suggest that it's really about economic subjugation. You cannot reason with these people. Yet how many of them suffer from a diagnosable "personality disorder" or psychotic illness? Not many, that's for sure.

It would be nice to think that we could persuade people with a "near-religious belief" that they're wrong, but they are beyond the pale. I hope I'm not just letting my anger get the best of me. I feel I'm being dispassionate about this, and that it's not just about name-calling.

Psychological analysis can be quite useful in helping to overcome capitalism. But before any progress can be made, we must recognize that the atomistic thinking characteristic of our society has distorted our understanding of mental illness. In fact, mental illness-- whether benign or malignant-- is primarily a function of society. What individuals experience is a mere shadow.

Ted



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list