P.S. Re Paul Churchland and eliminativism.

[Lisa & Ian Murray]

>>Susan Haack
in
her wonderful *Evidence and Inquiry* (the best book in epistemology
since Bonjour and Goldmann) reduces Rorty, Stich,Churchlands,
neopragmatism and a whole host of others to nothing. She argues for an
old fashioned combo of coherence and foundationalism.

I'm not a reducitonist so I don't think that ,even in
principle, neuroscience can give anything of an explanation about
macrophenomena (the economy,history etc.)

===========
Sam,

Just a query, you seem to be persuaded by Haack's reduction yet you claim
not to be a reductionist yourself. How so?  Or am I merely perplexing meself
on polysemy?

Ian