Zizek = the Third Way (was Re: Zizek on Haider)

[Apsken at aol.com]

>  OK, I'm being attacked either for 1) not being sufficiently familiar with
>  the information which CAQ has made available about the extreme and
>  corrosive reactionary stands which opus dei has taken or 2) for engaging
>  in "hate-filled anti-Catholicism" by failing to understand that opus dei
>  is not so bad after all.
>  
>  These charges are, of course, mutually exclusive.
>  
>  Can we reach some consensus on what I'm being charged with and then I'll
>  respond.

No, you are being charged with making irresponsible accusations, asserting 
that people hold or do not hold positions you attribute to them, based on no 
evidence whatever, in order to deflect discussion away from the subjects 
under debate -- in short, with being unscrupulous and unprincipled.

Ken Lawrence