Haider Haider Haider

kelley oudies at flash.net
Tue Feb 15 22:46:03 PST 2000


well no one commented on that paper i forwarded either, angela, so whatever. it looked like a pretty damned good analysis of the politics and events leading up to it all. anyway, i think the problem is that several people noted that they saw nothing particularly spectacular in zizek's analysis, nothing that's not been said here in other contexts. the reasoning behind it, that clinton, blur et al., are using it to solidify support for third way programs by naming Haider the evil enemy in order to make them look good is, as i pointed out first thing, pretty ordinary and very old. it is not clear to me that we can apply a general "law" specifying how we should react based on this analysis. that's my beef with such an approach: there are far too many specific processes and dynamics we need to ask about before we go rushing to the conclusion that the repressive Law is always productive of an identification with/desire for that which has been denied. as i pointed out when ken and i debated this issue re anti-racism last fall, it isn't clear to me that i or anyone should be "quiet" about racism/racialization as if somehow poiting it out can only and always invariably lead to groups emerging to support racism/racialization. finally, the uproar was over a general analysis of anti-racism as founded on that psychic dynamic. you, yourself, have suggested reservations to ken's account. and yes, i do agree that the all-round denunciations of ken/zizek/etc were a manifestation of this phenom, in part. but then, what makes that symptom any different than anyone else's? donning the mantle of a supercilious i can see what you can't see, as zizek does, is prompted by the very same dynamic.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list