CNN on CPUSA

Chip Berlet cberlet at igc.org
Tue Feb 22 20:13:09 PST 2000


Nice try, but wrong. The use of anti-sedition laws against fascists during what is called the "Brown-Scare" paved the way for the use of the laws against the left.

See:

Leo P. Ribuffo, The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Hard Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War, (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983).

----- Original Message -----

From: Gary Bramstedt

To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com

Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 10:49 PM

Subject: Re: CNN on CPUSA

Chris Burford wrote:

The follow report from the CNN website does not look wholly unfair or

inaccurate even though it ends in a patronising fashion.

The biggest weakness I could see is it does not mention McCarthyism.

Is it obviously incorrect on any point?

Chris Burford

London

Congress passed the Smith Act in 1940 -- making it unlawful to advocate the

violent overthrow of the U.S. government. That statute was used against

leaders of the Socialist Workers Party and fascist organizations before

World War II -- and against the CPUSA during the postwar years.

glb:

Was the Smith Act ever used retroactively?

It certainly was not applied to the attempt to "nulify" the FDR presidency in the '30's. Congress investigated but they found that the DuPont family, Morgan Bank, and others of that kind, were some of the main instigators. The DuPonts, with their contol of Remington Arms, were willing to supply the weapons. End of investigation; George Seldes (if I remember correctly my reading of "Plot to Seize the White House" by Jules Archer) salvaged the hearing's records, which were to be destroyed.

If I may opine, I would guess that the Smith Act was not used very often against fascist activities.

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20000222/9d6506c8/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list