US tax breaks violate trade rules, says WTO (fwd)

Guilherme Roschke gr at network3.entropy.upenn.edu
Fri Feb 25 06:03:24 PST 2000


http://straitstimes.asia1.com/world/wrld12_0225.html

US tax breaks violate trade rules,

says WTO

The ruling follows European complaints that the

concessions are illegal subsidies that give US

companies an unfair advantage

WASHINGTON -- In a stinging rebuke to the US, the

World Trade Organisation (WTO) has ruled that billions of

dollars in tax breaks enjoyed by American multinational

corporations violate global trade rules.

The ruling by the WTO, potentially the most financially

significant in its six-year existence, is sweet revenge for

European officials.

They have been miffed at what they view as aggressive

US challenges to their own trade practices, notably

restrictions on the import of beef and bananas.

While details of the decision, which was to be announced

formally at the WTO's Geneva headquarters yesterday,

were sketchy, it was clearly a major embarrassment for

the US.

Although administration officials repeatedly have assailed

Europe for failing to abandon trade barriers ruled illegal

by the WTO, they said they have no intention of

changing the corporate tax breaks. They planned to press

Europe to drop the matter, perhaps as part of a larger

deal.

In a statement on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary

Lawrence Summers said the US tax provision was "widely

viewed as creating a level playing field" for American

companies competing with Europe.

"We'll work closely with the Europeans, the business

community and the Congress to achieve a constructive

solution," he said.

Administration officials said the tax break, held dear by

many major US corporations, would be worth more than

US$4 billion (S$6.8 billion) to corporate America next

year and US$24 billion (S$41 billion) over the next five

years.

Used by companies that operate overseas entities, foreign

competitors had criticised it as a subsidy that gaves US

businesses an unfair advantage over rivals from Europe

and Asia.

Ironically, it was the smaller US victories on beef and

bananas that persuaded European officials to lash out

against the US tax break as an illegal export subsidy.

Europe was irritated by the US challenge to its restrictions

on bananas.

The European Union complained formally in 1998 that the

Foreign Sales Corporation provisions of the US tax code

amounted to an illegal export subsidy.

At issue are separate sales entities established by US

companies mostly in the US Virgin Islands, Barbados and

Guam that take advantage of tax exemptions on much of

export income. Among the major beneficiaries is Boeing

Co.

The EU claims about 50 per cent of all US exports pass

through the shelters, shaving between 15 per cent and 30

per cent off the tax bills of US exporters each year. US

officials couldn't confirm those numbers. -- Los Angeles

Times



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list