Populism (as shown in *The Progressive Populist*

Max Sawicky sawicky at epinet.org
Sat Jan 1 12:14:22 PST 2000


cc: Various analyses of populism habe been offered on this list in the past, but as I was reading through this issue of *The Progressive Populist* (January 1-15, 2000) it came to me that we had perhaps overlooked yhr most characteristic attribute of its current manifestations: Profoundly Dull. Moreover, two of the dullest contributors were two writers who have been widely praised (including by themselves) for avoiding the dullness which is said to characterize leftist discourse -- Jim Hightower and Michael Moore. . . . I think we can define "Modern Populism in the U.S." as the mask liberal Democrats wear between elections to avoid being too embarassed in front of their radical friends. Carrol
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Try writing two columns a week that actually aim to engage the common reader and see how you do.

While I disagree w/these two fellows on a lot of things, they have done quite a bit for the cause of popularizing radicalism/social democracy/ socialism in the U.S.

"Modern populism" is quite a few different things. For instance, it's Jimmy Hoffa, Gary Bauer, Ralph Nader, and Doug Henwood.

Some who invoke the term are really liberals or radicals with a gimmick or a drawl. A modern redefinition that is constructive and authentic remains to be accomplished. Not unlike "marxism- leninism," tho in the latter case the job is not worth the effort, except perhaps as a recreational pursuit.

mbs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list