>Zizek should have no reason to be concerned about whether or not I like his
>work. He is well known and probably well remunerated (as academics go),
>whereas my criticisms of his work are only available from LBO-talk. No
>practical threat to his reputation.
Probably not, but he seemed genuinely curious. He asked with force (though he says pretty much everything with force), and repeated the question twice.
I don't see an answer in your quotes from Sartre, or your comments on them. Are you saying that anything like psychology is just too individualistic for a Marxist to take seriously? All we are is dust in the historical wind?