I would not pay too much attention to what the Eastern European scribbling class says about "civil society" or any other subject that resonates in the 'West.' Paraphrasing John Kenneth Galbraith, these folks tend to be well versed in the art of providing the needed conclusions to those in the position to bestow status and resources upon them, be it the communist party nomenklature or western aid offcials and foundations. As my Mexican friend used to say, "for money, even a dog will dance" - let alone symbol manipulators weaned from government-funded sinecures.
The best way of approaching at all this "civil society" babbling is to skip the normative parts telling us what "civi society" ought to be (about 3/4 of what's been written on the subject) and focus on empirical research of what the said organizations are actually doing. Caustion: "empirical" does NOT mean "anectdotal."
wojtek