War as a happening thing
Jim heartfield
jim at heartfield.demon.co.uk
Sun Jan 23 02:37:01 PST 2000
In message <01e401bf656a$66f90dc0$94e13ecb at rcollins>, rc-am
<rcollins at netlink.com.au> writes
>
>I've argued a number of times that postmodernism is another way -- an
>aestheticised and/or idealistic way -- of talking about changes to the mode
>of production, for which we might look to concepts such as real and formal
>subsumption as a way of indicating and talking about those changes. Those
>who bemoan 'pomos' really enact a similar aestheticisation by rendering it
>as a cultural choice, philosophical brand-name, or job competitor in
>litcrit depts -- ie., whilst some folks complain that 'pomo' is not
>marxism, they can't manage to deliver a marxist analysis of what this might
>be. Implicit here is the assertion that nothing has _really_ hanged (by
>which 'really' is taken to mean actual practices, the ways in which life is
>produced and reproduced, etc), and hence that 'pomo' comes from the skies,
>someone's head, the world of ideas -- merely (!) ideas.
Doubtless there are changes in the mode of production, but not yet, as
far as I can see a change in the mode of production. These ought to be
isolated. But pomo does not do that. It takes surface appearances for
ontological categories and declares, abstractly, an end to all grand
narratives.
But there is a median point between the end to all grand narratives and
the (admittedly depressing) assertion that things are the same as they
have always been. That is that the subjective factor in history has been
decisively set back. I mean the working class was beaten, and
internalised its beating as despair, and further that the ruling class,
having defined its own project for a century in terms of containing
working class pressure, is also disoriented. These are real conditions
that reproduce the ideas of 'the death of the Subject' and so on. But
there is no more reason to think those ideas an adequate expression of
the trends the mirror, than, for example, a fundamentalist Marxism that
insists nothing has ever changed.
--
Jim heartfield
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list