Nader & Litmus Tests

TRox51 at aol.com TRox51 at aol.com
Mon Jul 3 07:01:48 PDT 2000


Tom, You totally miss the point. Nader didn't want and didn't like coverage of labor issues in the US in the Multinational Monitor. It was much safer for him to stick to consumer issues. TS

In a message dated 7/2/00 2:37:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, TLehman at lor.net writes:


> Tim---I'm not trying to belittle your efforts. You should remember that
> everyone from Mike Wallace's daughter to Prince Charles made the scene in
the
> Mon Valley in the 80's---a lot of good it did us.
>
> The problem is and was that labor has to connect/re-connect with broader
> constituencies. Like the environmental and the consumer. If this is the
> direction that Nader was pushing you in the early 80's, as you indicate, he
> was giving you good direction!!!
>
> I'm not one to dismiss conspiracy theories out of hand. Matter of fact
Penn
> State published an interesting little conspiracy theory book on the
> destruction of the steel industry, the Mon Valley and American industry in
> general.
>
> Even if conspiracies are true and they involve the elite in high places in
> our government---they can be overcome if our political base is broad enough.
>
> Tom Lehman
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list