I doubt it will air again. Those things are like filler.
max
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Yates" <mikey+ at pitt.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:44 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Spanked
> Max,
>
> Congratulations!! I watch that asshole O'Reilly from time
to time. He
> is really stupid, but he thinks he's so smart. Let me know
if there is a
> repeat; I am very sorry I missed your annihilation of
O'Reilly. I think
> he was involved in the development of "Inside Edition" or
a show like
> it, and he once said that this was a really innovative
news show! Maybe
> you can get on Hamity and Combs (spelling?) another Fox
show. Hamity is
> a bigger fool than O'Reilly. He was really something
jabbering about
> Cuba during the Elian kidnapping.
>
> Michael Yates
>
> Max Sawicky wrote:
> >
> > Just got this cc'ed from a fan of my debating partner
> > tonight . . .
> >
> > mbs
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: **************** >
> > To: <oreilly at foxnews.com>
> > Cc: <sawicky at epinet.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:25 PM
> > Subject: Spanked
> >
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > You were way out of your league last night O'Reilly.
I am
> > a regular viewer,
> > > and am usually impressed with your command of your
subject
> > matter.
> > >
> > > It was kind of embarrassing to see you sliced diced
and
> > fed to the dog by
> > > Mr. Sawicky in terms of your understanding of such
common
> > tax concepts as
> > > marginal vs. average tax rates.
> > >
> > > Your obvious lack of subject knowledge, made the valid
> > points you were
> > > trying to convey much less credible.
> > >
> > > The next time you decide to debate a complex topic
like
> > federal tax policy
> > > with a PhD in the subject, realize you need to be VERY
> > much more prepared!!
> > >
> > > Present criticism notwithstanding, I think your show
is
> > great and I'm a big
> > > fan. Keep it up!!
> > >
> > > ---------------
> > > Washington, DC
> > >
> > >
>