no, chuck, there's no argument to develop further. it is painfully obvious that whenever you claim to be making amoral arguments, you really are: you are making a normative claim about how people *should* act. you are legislating behavior and so you are moralizing.
kelley
At 01:52 AM 7/13/00 -0700, Chuck Grimes wrote:
>of course, every word you utter is a moral judgment on gordon and
>anyone else who might think (what you think is) your coldly
>calculating amorality is wrong and immoral.
>
>kelley
>
>-------------
>
>Gee Kelley,
>
>did you want to develop this through some argument or just express
>your outrage?
>
>I believe the issue was that I advocated that I vote. Both Gordon and
>Ted said that I shouldn't because I would feel bad later.
>
>Chuck