Computation and Human Experience (RRE)

Peter van Heusden pvh at egenetics.com
Tue Jun 13 00:24:09 PDT 2000


On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Dace wrote:
>
> The idea of genes as blueprint for the body is now universally dismissed
> among molecular biologists. I first learned of the growing skepticism back
> in '88 from my cell biology professor in college. The idea of "genetic
> program" or "instruction manual" got scrapped as hopelessly untenable. Now
> it's thought that the plan for the organism somehow emerges in the course of
> the "conversation" between genes and proteins in the developing embryo. The
> British geneticist Enrico Coen, who presents the new view in his book, *The
> Art of Genes*, frankly admits that researchers don't even have a clue as to
> how the deep interiors of cells give rise to the outward forms of
> multicellular organisms. As in the case of vision, there's no particular
> reason to assume that the going theory will ever provide any kind of real
> answer.

Yes, I think the term 'conversation' is a good one here. We now know that the machinery inside the cell is highly complex, and contains 'decision making' elements. DNA replication, for instance, has a capacity to detect and correct errors while replicating. Other phenomenon, like 'gene silencing', are even more remarkable - in response to 'perceived' invasion by certain forms of viruses, cells switch off the expression of corresponding genetic paterns - so if the virus managed to invade the cell's DNA, its expression is halted. Studies of the behaviour of cells are showing that rather than being a simple 'program', DNA is structured as part of a complex interaction between cells and the world around them (which includes things like retroviruses, and other threats to DNA's integrity).

It is increasingly clear that the 'preservation of state' within cells is not a static reality, but a dynamic process (unfortunately, a lot of popular consciousness, as well as biotechnology research, still operates largely on the basis of the 'static' model). Our bodies, in a sense, are communities of interacting cells, with extremely complex relations of interaction.

Peter -- Peter van Heusden <pvh at egenetics.com> NOTE: I do not speak for my employer, Electric Genetics "Criticism has torn up the imaginary flowers from the chain not so that man shall wear the unadorned, bleak chain but so that he will shake off the chain and pluck the living flower." - Karl Marx, 1844



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list