Where was the Color at A16 in D.C.?

Gordon Fitch gcf at panix.com
Wed Jun 21 07:08:36 PDT 2000


JKSCHW at aol.com:
> In a message dated 6/20/00 9:18:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gcf at panix.com
> writes:
>
> << So which is it? Complaints about the alienated conditions of
> nulcear families and wage labor are "blah blah" and a rude
> offense to honest workingmen, or a important subject for which
> plain speaking and action might be appropriate? What is it
> you're going to do something about? >>
>
> Don't be obtuse. Obviously it's a bad thing about modern life that our social
> conditions put so much burden of childcare on the parents, typically the mom,
> in the nuclear family; and that people have to work long hours and don't have
> time to do other things they might like to do, including organize to change
> those conditions. We work to chnage them within the limits placed on us by
> the demands of work and family.
>
> What is insulting is to have some student twerps with lots of free time on
> their hands and no kids to be responsible for tell you that the
> organizational conditions that might make it possible for working parents to
> participate in a movement to change things amounts to complicity in our own
> oppression, reproduction of alienated conscioness, and other blah balh that
> you seem to think passes for plain speaking.
>
> As an "honest workingman" (and my wife is an "honest workingwoman, I guess)
> in this position myself, I don't pretend to speak for others. But you won't
> get any action from me or my wife if your meetings take more than an hour and
> a half, cause we gotta get up for work and take care of the kids. Howzat for
> plain speaking? --jks

I think for starters you could lose the gratuitous insults ("student twerps") and drop the rank-pulling as well; I'm probably much more working-class than thou.

After that I'd like it if you decided whether a radical analysis of our lives is "blah blah" or has some kind of validity. Or is it postmodernistically both at once? What do you believe in, besides efficiency?



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list