> But Lord knows we'd never trust him to implement it. If one was voting on
> pure union interests, I'm afraid one would have to follow Nathan and vote
> for
> Gore -- a pitiful kick in the facer who is sadly still the best on offer.
>
> And besides, as Nathan never tires of reminding us, what really counts for
> getting better organizing laws passed is finally getting a Senate majority
> some day.
>
What makes you so sure of this? How do you know Ralph's not a genuine
hypocrite who thinks unions are good everywhere but in his own shop?
Seth