Marx

[Carl Remick]

>Well, what with the Marat thing being thrown into the mix, I assumed the we
>were now using "19th-century" in a more broadly expansive sense.
>
>Dates have no real bearing on my question:  Was Gibbon stanky, or wasn't 
>he?

Well, yes, dates are relevant.  Presumably by the 19th century Gibbon, 
however aromatic in life, stank no more ;-)

Carl
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com